Comments on: Mobile Browsing Up With Android Leading The Pack http://www.droiddog.com/android-blog/2010/01/mobile-browsing-up-with-android-leading-the-pack/ Android videos, reviews, RSS, and forums Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:06:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Joe http://www.droiddog.com/android-blog/2010/01/mobile-browsing-up-with-android-leading-the-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-17556 Joe Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:24:52 +0000 http://www.droiddog.com/?p=5159#comment-17556 I'm a big fan of Android, but I have to say, this post makes no sense.<br><br>First: the graph has no Y scale. So it has no meaning whatsoever. I realize this chart is from the Market Share site, but there's no sense in republishing it. <br><br>Second: Android is up 54.8%. Woohoo! But this is also meaningless. 58% more than what? If Android had 1 user and went up to 3 users, it would be up 200%!!!!! But it would still only have 3 users.<br><br>The table below the original chart helps give some numbers: in December, Android had 0.05% of the browser share (including all desktop browsers). By comparison, iPhone had 0.44% of the browser market, about 9x as much as Android. I'm a big fan of Android, but I have to say, this post makes no sense.

First: the graph has no Y scale. So it has no meaning whatsoever. I realize this chart is from the Market Share site, but there's no sense in republishing it.

Second: Android is up 54.8%. Woohoo! But this is also meaningless. 58% more than what? If Android had 1 user and went up to 3 users, it would be up 200%!!!!! But it would still only have 3 users.

The table below the original chart helps give some numbers: in December, Android had 0.05% of the browser share (including all desktop browsers). By comparison, iPhone had 0.44% of the browser market, about 9x as much as Android.

]]> By: Wendell http://www.droiddog.com/android-blog/2010/01/mobile-browsing-up-with-android-leading-the-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-17557 Wendell Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:17:35 +0000 http://www.droiddog.com/?p=5159#comment-17557 The Droid is the first "phone" I've seen where surfing the web is not painful. It's fast, the screen is very good, etc... What annoys me though is that many websites recognize that it's a phone and automatically throw me to their "mobile" site. Which is generally not full-featured and often times doesn't offer the same functionality of their full site, which the Droid can handle. Grrrrr The Droid is the first “phone” I've seen where surfing the web is not painful. It's fast, the screen is very good, etc… What annoys me though is that many websites recognize that it's a phone and automatically throw me to their “mobile” site. Which is generally not full-featured and often times doesn't offer the same functionality of their full site, which the Droid can handle. Grrrrr

]]> By: Joe http://www.droiddog.com/android-blog/2010/01/mobile-browsing-up-with-android-leading-the-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-8182 Joe Sun, 03 Jan 2010 15:24:52 +0000 http://www.droiddog.com/?p=5159#comment-8182 I'm a big fan of Android, but I have to say, this post makes no sense.<br><br>First: the graph has no Y scale. So it has no meaning whatsoever. I realize this chart is from the Market Share site, but there's no sense in republishing it. <br><br>Second: Android is up 54.8%. Woohoo! But this is also meaningless. 58% more than what? If Android had 1 user and went up to 3 users, it would be up 200%!!!!! But it would still only have 3 users.<br><br>The table below the original chart helps give some numbers: in December, Android had 0.05% of the browser share (including all desktop browsers). By comparison, iPhone had 0.44% of the browser market, about 9x as much as Android. I'm a big fan of Android, but I have to say, this post makes no sense.

First: the graph has no Y scale. So it has no meaning whatsoever. I realize this chart is from the Market Share site, but there's no sense in republishing it.

Second: Android is up 54.8%. Woohoo! But this is also meaningless. 58% more than what? If Android had 1 user and went up to 3 users, it would be up 200%!!!!! But it would still only have 3 users.

The table below the original chart helps give some numbers: in December, Android had 0.05% of the browser share (including all desktop browsers). By comparison, iPhone had 0.44% of the browser market, about 9x as much as Android.

]]> By: Joe http://www.droiddog.com/android-blog/2010/01/mobile-browsing-up-with-android-leading-the-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-3173 Joe Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:24:52 +0000 http://www.droiddog.com/?p=5159#comment-3173 I'm a big fan of Android, but I have to say, this post makes no sense.<br><br>First: the graph has no Y scale. So it has no meaning whatsoever. I realize this chart is from the Market Share site, but there's no sense in republishing it. <br><br>Second: Android is up 54.8%. Woohoo! But this is also meaningless. 58% more than what? If Android had 1 user and went up to 3 users, it would be up 200%!!!!! But it would still only have 3 users.<br><br>The table below the original chart helps give some numbers: in December, Android had 0.05% of the browser share (including all desktop browsers). By comparison, iPhone had 0.44% of the browser market, about 9x as much as Android. I'm a big fan of Android, but I have to say, this post makes no sense.

First: the graph has no Y scale. So it has no meaning whatsoever. I realize this chart is from the Market Share site, but there's no sense in republishing it.

Second: Android is up 54.8%. Woohoo! But this is also meaningless. 58% more than what? If Android had 1 user and went up to 3 users, it would be up 200%!!!!! But it would still only have 3 users.

The table below the original chart helps give some numbers: in December, Android had 0.05% of the browser share (including all desktop browsers). By comparison, iPhone had 0.44% of the browser market, about 9x as much as Android.

]]> By: Wendell http://www.droiddog.com/android-blog/2010/01/mobile-browsing-up-with-android-leading-the-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-3158 Wendell Sun, 03 Jan 2010 11:17:35 +0000 http://www.droiddog.com/?p=5159#comment-3158 The Droid is the first "phone" I've seen where surfing the web is not painful. It's fast, the screen is very good, etc... What annoys me though is that many websites recognize that it's a phone and automatically throw me to their "mobile" site. Which is generally not full-featured and often times doesn't offer the same functionality of their full site, which the Droid can handle. Grrrrr The Droid is the first “phone” I've seen where surfing the web is not painful. It's fast, the screen is very good, etc… What annoys me though is that many websites recognize that it's a phone and automatically throw me to their “mobile” site. Which is generally not full-featured and often times doesn't offer the same functionality of their full site, which the Droid can handle. Grrrrr

]]>