Battery Technology Rant [Video]

Mobile devices have come a long way in the years we’ve been covering Android here at DroidDog. Display technologies have evolved significantly, processor speeds and graphics power have increased exponentially and phones have reached minimums in size. Tablets are thinner and more powerful than ever, and feature newer technologies like 4G radios, NFC and more. All this comes at the cost of battery life.

It’s a known fact: The amount of power you can get out of a device is directlyly inversely proportional to its battery efficiency. This means when you see the stat sheet of what looks like an amazing phone, laptop or smartphone on paper, you’re looking at a pretty limited usage time off the charger. Sure, you can always sacrifice the thinness of your DROID Bionic by purchasing an extended battery. But then how pocketable is it? Sure, you can turn off the 4G radios in your new LTE smartphone. But what good is your new contract now?

The point is this: Old battery technology sucks. Yes, you can implement a larger battery, but you can only make a battery so big in a handheld device. The state of current mobile lithium-ion batteries is embarrasing. What will change this? A revolutionary new battery technology? Solar powered mini-cells? Micro-nuclear battery compartments? I don’t have my engineering degree yet. But I’d love to see some progress! Are you in the same boat? Sound off in the comments!

Tags: , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

og droid was not 800mhz , I believe it was only 550mhz

First, a small gripe about the rant. You use two different measuring standards when comparing the DROID1 to the Note. Please try to keep consistent units when comparing specs of different devices. DROID1 thickness is 0.54" vs Note thickness 0.38" (or 13.7mm vs 9.65mm). Gripe over. What follows is a rant answering your rant. ;-) Don't you think the battery researchers are trying? Current battery technology is actually much better in energy density and current capacity than 10 years ago. Imagine trying to power your smart phones with NiCad or NiMH batteries. Unfortunately, Moore's Law doesn't (unfortunately) apply to battery technology, and smartphone technology has actually been moving faster than Moore's Law because it's just adapting existing PC/laptop/netbook technologies. Before asking "why can't they make a better battery?", why don't you educate yourself on how the state of the art battery technologies have advanced over the years, and what the physical and chemical hurdles are that need to be conquered to get higher energy density batteries (without the batteries exploding like earlier generation Lithium-ion batteries)... To be honest, the extended battery on my BIONIC really isn't that big a deal physically but I actually get nearly a day out of the phone now so it is a big deal for useability. For comparison, it does make my BIONIC a bit thicker (at 0.62" or 15.7mm) than my DROID1, and a bit heavier at 185.1g (6.53oz) vs DROID1 at 169.8g (5.99oz). But subjectively they both seem to have the same heft in my hand. I would have preferred to have the extended battery as my original battery for the BIONIC and saved $25 (the VerizonCorp store sold me the extended battery at 50% off). But, I can also see why they didn't do that in a market where one has to be thin to win, even unrealistically thin (hmmm like super models?)...

I agree!  If they stopped coming out with phones for the next year and released a legit battery instead, I wouldn't even be mad. 

"more than doubled" is really a 100% increase, not 200%.  200% increase is really 3x.

Wake the heck up kids.  If they made cell phone batteries better that means the tesla and volt and prius automobile batteries would be better.  Hmmmm I wonder who would not let this happen?

Htc Sensation battery is pathetic