Can The Galaxy Nexus Save Sprint?

It’s no secret that Sprint is struggling as a network, with many users reporting poor 3G speeds and a weak 4G network. On top of that, they are now making the switch from WiMax to LTE, a move that will either make or break the carrier. Sprint was once a premiere Android carrier, with the EVO 4G, the best phone of its time. Since then there hasn’t been an exclusive handset on the carrier that has gained such success, and Sprint’s proven to be more of a last resort than a carrier people truly want to be on.

Some may recall my article about how the EVO 4G LTE is a disappointment, where I stated that the EVO doesn’t have what it takes to bring a dying carrier back into the game. Despite having all the high-end features of many phones coming to the market, it had nothing to truly differentiate it. We now have information of the first LTE phone that will be hitting the Now Network, and it won’t be the EVO.

The Samsung Galaxy Nexus originally launched in markets outside the US, later hitting Verizon in mid-December (after more than enough delays). It proved to be a hit for the carrier, bringing the Nexus experience to Big Red for the first time. Not too long after Sprint announced they would be launching it alongside its new LTE network, a move that was very unexpected. Just today we heard that the handset will finally be shipping April 22nd. The LTE network isn’t live yet, but I’ve heard a few grumblings of a couple markets already being live.

Sprint needed this device at it’s launch. At this point, anyone who has been dying to get the handset has already gotten it. And with no official LTE at launch, the Verizon version is already better.  I had one for a few months, and it has been the most impressive Android handset to date. But is it enough to bring Sprint back? Not when it’s been available on Verizon since last year.

LTE is all the rage these days, proving to be the fatest and most reliable form of 4G. Sprint and Clearwire’s WiMax network is shutting down in 2015, and that proves that LTE has won the race. But Sprint is already behind. Verizon has had its network running for over a year now, and AT&T has since late last year. Sure, T-Mobile might not have even announced its full LTE plans, but it has a blazing 42Mbps HSPA+ network to hold out for now. Trust me, it’s better than the WiMax Sprint offers.

So could the Galaxy Nexus really make a difference? Doubtful, at best. Sprint needs a handset that no other carrier will offer, containing the best specs, a sexy body, and a camera only the gods would use. As it turns out, a phones camera can make or break the sale for many people.

Is anyone planning on pre-ordering the Galaxy Nexus? Is it even worth grabbing at this point?

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

C'mon Eric. Who are you kidding? I've certainly earned my right bitch about Sprint... been with them for 12 years.  Sprint's a dinosaur. Their network is congested and slow. There's no denying or reasoning out of this fact. My friends and I run speed test on it frequently and at best you may reach 1.5 and fall short of 2mbps and in most cases is crawling at .2 - .3 mbps. You know it's bad when my friend sends me a screenshot (from his 4S I might add) of speed test with the upload speed faster than the download.  Sprint has crappy phones and having to activate ESN is frustrating since you can never bring your own phone (Pre3 anyone?).  And just now, they're getting Nexus? C'

mon now... I'm done with Sprint. Good bye.

I was very disapointed in this article. Before I go to bat for Sprint, let me just say that I'm an long time AT&T customer and world traveler - I'm very familiar with non-US markets, particularly in Asia.

 

First - the premise that Sprint needs saving is nothing short of silly. The only major national carrier to offer truly unlimited data - no meaningful throttles - doesn't have anything to fear from other carriers. One might say that as a result of their unlimited policies, Sprints network suffers - but although their data speeds in some areas are low, so is their latency - and that's what counts for almost all web content. 

 

The only time you need "4G" (which in the US is CRAP anyway - asian 3g I've used networks can compete the Bells' LTE  any day, while providing universal coverage and low price) is for HD video, be that video chat or HD streaming, but without u/l data, that can be a very costly proposition. Low GB metered LTE is, apparently, one of the most convincing lies ever created - artificially keep prices high to scare people away from using their mobile devices the way they should be able to, while crippling the 3G capabilities consumers had before the roleout. 

 

As for your claim about LTE being "reliable" - that has hardly been the case in the US. Verizon's "LTE" (really, a proprietary LTE flavor - thanks Big Red) crashed a number of times last year, often taking the rest of the network with it. AT&T had similar problems, like their outage in LA. LTE - real LTE - is a wonderful techonology, but to the end user its current implementation is so expensive, so unreliable, and has such limited coverage as so to be funcitonally useless.

 

I'm glad to see the US is waking up in mobile land - we've lagged behind long enough - but the predatory bussiness policies of the major carriers, combimed with the anti-competitive nature of the market (all different techs/frequencies - high barriers to substution) mean that the consumer gets screwed out of most of the benefits of these inovations. In the Asian markets (and to a lesser extent, in Europe) consumers have unlocked phones, and fast, cheap unlimited data (4mbits/sec on HSPA, higher on HSPA+).

 

Given Sprint's aging CDMA network, they're doing quite well in my book. They offer unlockable phones that work on both global networks and competing networks (Moto Photon, for example, unlockable and works on AT&T 3.5G, T-mo 2G), is deploying an LTE network,  and they are very well managed - both on the business end and the tech end. They're managing to offer a reasonably competitive service in spite of most of their business partners bailing or otherwise screwing them, competitors that use predatory business practices, and inheriting an ailing network from their draconian 90s business model that dragged its way through the first few years of the 21st century.

 

If they can pull this off, I can't wait to see what they'll pull out of their hats in a year or two. 

 

As far as phones? They come and go - one could use unlocked International Nexuses on AT&T and T-Mo's 3.5G networks much earlier than on VZ, with much better high speed coverage, no contract, and in T-Mo's case not even needed to pay for the phone subsidy. Folks who are truly phone obsessed will never be daunted by release dates - they will always find an import, a loophole, or an early "in". Android phones are practically clones of each other, and iOS devices are all identical - what really matters is service and that is where Sprint shines. Better coverage than T-Mo, less evil than AT&T and VZ, and better managed than any of them. The service is here, and I'll take that over data speeds any day.

ChristopherPage 7 pts

@Eric thank you for writing this so I don't have to. It blows my mind that people say such bad things about sprint when the other carriers charge more and offer next to nothing in terms of usage. 2gb? Seriously? I rang up 190 gb in the last month on wimax, no exaggeration. Imagine what that would cost on the others. Not to mention, lte will be unlimited too. And it's not going anywhere.

JaysonVelazquez 5 pts

I dont think the Galaxy Nexus could save Sprint. Hopefully Sprint pops out amazing LTE capable phones by the end of the year. Personally i think sprint is starting to get their heads out their butts and realizing what they have to do. Yeah it will take a couple years but the outcome, if all goes as planed, should be great I think by 2015 sprint will be completely back in the game. LTE on their 800MHz spectrum, updated 3g, faster 3g speeds, HD voice calling, possibly even LTE Advanced (Pretty much Network Vision) It will take a lot of work but if they stick to it they will be back on track. Hopefully network vision is completed in a timely matter. Im just seriously hoping that everything gets done and everyone is happy. 

DamienHayes 5 pts

I dont think that a single device can "Save" any network. What Sprint needs is the completion of Network Vision. Ive been a Sprint customer for a few years and I love them as much as you can love a carrier, their all inherently evil. The problem has never been that they did not have good enough handsets but that service is lacking in certain regions. Customer service is great, devices are great, prices are great, service????? As long as Network Vision is completed expeditiously than customers will def come and problem solved