Is It Really Acceptable That Ice Cream Sandwich Is Only On 5% Of Android Devices?

Every month the Android Developers release the Android distribution charts. These charts contain statistics on where Android is at, and one of the most important is what Android version is powering devices. Back in November of last year, Android 4.0 was released to manufacturers. Now, almost 6 months later, we learn that Android 4.0 is only on 5% of all Android devices with access to Google Play. That’s just disgusting.

After 6 months, half a year, centuries in phone time, and the latest version of Android only holds a small fraction of the market? Manufacturers, what is going on in your minds?

One could make the argument that Android 4.0 requires more time to get running on devices, and custom UIs just add to that. Sure, that’s understandable. But only for the first 4 months. 6 months in, I think that there is no excuse for a handset not being updated. On top of that, there’s still devices launching with Gingerbread as the version of Android. Why is there any reason that a handset should be launched with Gingerbread in this day and age?

To this date, there have only been a handful of high-end Android handsets updated to 4.0. The Galaxy S II line is getting it overseas, but even then only when carriers approve. We have just heard that Samsung Canada is rolling out the update to multiple devices, but we have no idea when every handset will be updated. Tablets have been a little better, with ASUS and Acer on top of their game, but oddly enough big manufacturer Samsung has mostly neglected the tablet market.

I love Android, but how can I buy a handset knowing that it could take 6+ months to get an update? This even applies to Nexus devices. It took months for the Nexus S to get bumped to Android 4.0, and the Galaxy Nexus on Verizon is also behind in getting its update. From my point of view, there is no Android handset that I could buy right now, knowing that it will not be updated promptly.

I used to spend plenty of time hacking and rooting my devices, and I’m very familiar with the process of flashing ROMs. With more popular phones, there’s usually a chance that you can get the latest update quicker through a custom ROM. The only problem is that 99% of the time, there isn’t a perfect ROM. One may get close, but then have a glaring bug that ruins the experience for me. On top of that, my life has become much more busy than it previously was, and I don’t want to have to worry about flashing custom ROMs.

I can’t see this changing in the future, and it has prevented me more than once from buying a handset. Does something like this affect your purchasing decisions?

Tags: , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
AnthonyDouglas 5 pts

This is unacceptable!!! Okay so I've been waiting since January for ICS on my Droid Razr & now the update is supposed to be here May 21st...I bet they will push it back again, I love how store reps lie just to make a sale "Oh yea it will be updated in late January, mid February, late February, definitely March, April 29th and here it is MAY & still no ICS....sure I could root it but any Verizon phone that I've done a root on (Samsung, HTC & Motorola) & there is a new s/w update you get those annoying update notifications. This is so frustrating...may switch to a Windows device 

When windows comes out with a new operating system, i dont have to wait for the pc manufacturers to push out the os update to me. I just buy the new OS and install it. Phones need to be the same way. We should be able to download the OS straight from google and install it on our phones. Likewise phones need to be more OS agnostic. Any phone you buy should be able to run WP7 or android and you should be able to buy that OS seperate from the phone.

gdeadfan 10 pts

It's Google's fault. It's the manufacturer's faults.  It's the carrier's faults.  Too many people are at fault, and unable to work together to fix these faults.  That's what happens in a situation like this.  It is unacceptable, but unavoidable.

Looks like the only way to be sure you get the OS you desire is to buy it installed - I have an Epic 4g Touch from Sprint - I have given up on an update

TheOneandOnlyAnonymouse 36 pts

We try and say that the fact that apple releases phones only once a year and have a long distance between released of iOS and devices is a good thing. We praise them because of the common fanboy belief that apple doesnt release cutting edge tech because they want to wait until they can make it a consistent experience (which in truth is because it would cost too much and not leave enough of a profit margin). Then, we turn around and yell at android for releasing too many phones and being to hasty in releasing updates and patches and new devices. 

 

Then.....when Android takes 6 months (half the time it takes for a new iOS to release) to start implementing a new OS version onto devices, and OEMs take time to make sure that they are not being too hasty to release and not creating an inconsistent to the model experience...we then yell at android for not being fast enough and hasty enough.

 

Isnt there something a little wrong with the logic here? 

KeesShadley 5 pts

 TheOneandOnlyAnonymouse Very good observation.  What make people think that old technology will always be updated to new technology, The tech curve is moving faster than most companies could even think of keeping up with, and Android has not held back in releasing what we all want, updates.

FryeDaddyTN 8 pts

Part of the reason is manufacturers and service providers do not like that ICS allows endusers to "disable" their bloatware that Gingerbread forces the consumers to "deal with".

 

Why hurry with ICS if the numbers of slaves to VZW Navigator; V Cast, etc are freed?

 

Why go to ICS if the user will be easier able to load a new ROM and get rid of the manufacturer UI designed to appeal to the lowest common denominator of teenage girls?

TheOneandOnlyAnonymouse 36 pts

 FryeDaddyTN actually, I dont think that any version of android really hinders new roms. If any do, it is typically newer versions with locked parts, kernels, etc. 

 

I frequent, and have programmed for, XDA developers on roms and bootloaders and other things for many devices. 

Matlock 12 pts

Honestly, here in the states we have TWO big roadblocks preventing us from getting updates in a reasonable amount of time; the manufacturers and their custom skins, and the Service providers. The galaxy nexus has been updated in a reasonable amount of time, at least GSM version. The Nexus S was updated quite early, but had the update pulled because of issues, and then the update was pushed out again. Yes, It took a while for the update to come to Nexus S, but it was a huge update. Its not like it was an exponential update that added a few features, so it should have been expected for the Nexus S, to take longer to update. As far as every one else goes, they have to adapt their own UIs to this newer version of Android, so it is going to take longer. Yes, it does suck that we have to wait for these updates, but it is what it is. This is the only instance that I do give Apple and Microsoft credit, for their update process. I just wish the Manufacturers would streamline their custom UIs, so that they dont take so long to update their phones. Also, I wish that the Service Providers' apps were removable from the phones, to give us the users, the option of freeing up memory on carrier branded devices. well those are my 2cents.

Gamercore 26 pts

Carriers play a bigger role in this than you know. Manufacturers like HTC and Samsung who release so many phones throughout the year have to "sell" these devices to carriers. Often times, they have to show them software that isn't on any of the old devices, new features and attempt to differentiate them older and sometimes the same models on other carriers. My (very unpopular opinion) is that I don't think OEM's should update devices past their current firmwares. Just keep up with maintenance updates like how Microsoft does with Windows to keep everything stable. Then they could focus more energy on releasing new devices with the newer firmware a lot quicker and there would be less issues with bugs.

DanDaniel 15 pts

95% of the consumer doessnt care. They have what they have and they are happy. Once the consumer DEMAND more from the carriers then MAYBE the carriers start to listen. People are just too complacent with everything in their lives to care about their phones.

The carrier dont care to update older devices as it cost them upgrades to the newer devices. Why upgrade the SII when the SIII is right around the corner and you get a new contract out the existing customer for the newer OS?

deraildoax 10 pts

@DanDaniel What blew me away was how many average people I spoke with that really don't want their user interface and user experience changing. A lot of people aren't tech savvy, so changing up their phones software every six months would actually piss a lot of people off. I had to send out a mass email to every android owner I know when I saw the first implementation of the new on screen menu button in Instagram. Because the physical menu button didn't do the same thing as that on screen button. I screen shotted and emailed the new info out because I knew some people wouldn't figure it out right away.