Samsung, You’re Doing North America Right With The Galaxy S III

One year ago, in May of 2011, Samsung launched the Galaxy S II. At the time, many regions received the stock variant, and the European rollout went smoothly. One of the biggest problems for Samsung at the launch was one of their biggest markets: North America.

It took until September, 5 months later, for the first Galaxy S II variant to hit the US. Now, many believe that carriers are the ones causing the delays, but Samsung could easily get the phone ready in time for launch. The 5 month delay was annoying to say the least, and I was one of many who fell out of the hype Samsung worked so hard to build up. It didn’t stop the handset from selling millions upon millions of units, but it could have had a much bigger impact in the US.

I feared that a repeat could happen with the Galaxy S III, something that could even destroy Samsung’s name in the US. Then, about a week ago, after speaking with a few sources, I was assured that Samsung would be doing it right this time. I was told the Galaxy S III would be launching in North America on June 20th, and would you look at that: multiple Canadian carriers have confirmed that they will be launching the phone on the 20th.

How does this apply to the US, you say? My sources claim that the S III will be hitting at least 2 carriers in the US on the 20th, which lines up with a rumor from TmoNews not too long ago. Everything is coming together, and it can’t be long before the US carriers make their announcements. My prediction? Tuesday, June 5th will be the announcement day, and pre-orders for the device will begin Friday, the 8th.

Another huge debacle about the device is what processor will be powering it. Up until today, rumor on the street had been that the Exynos still isn’t LTE compatible, which was confirmed with much despair. A dual-core processor will be in the North American S III, and from first glance, that could hinder plenty of sales. Samsung is on it though, and threw in an extra gig of RAM, bringing the device to 2GB. Something that I’ve learned with Android is that with all the multitasking going on, RAM can actually matter more in terms of speed than the processor. Anyone concerned about the North American variant having speed issues should not worry – this phone will fly.

Next month will be huge for Samsung in North America, and as long as the device doesn’t see any delays, they may have the biggest Android hit to date on their hands. Kudos to Samsung, my upgrade will probably be used on a shiny new Galaxy S III.

Tags: , , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
deitiphobia 6 pts

Seriously though, the quad core is just for us geeks. No one else really cares what processor is inside a phone, just as long as it's fast and delivers a great experience. 

 

Most people probably don't even know if their current phone is dual core or not, yet alone that quad core even exist. 

I was a little upset about the dual core thing, but the extra RAM makes me feel much better. Looks like I won't have to spend $700 on the international version (wasn't actually going to do that).

TheDark_Knight 77 pts

Great! Just so you know DroidDog. I love that you use liveFrye. I stopped commenting on Phonedog because they use Facebook, which pretty much sucks. Also, your site automatically detects I have a phone and loads the mobile site, ten times faster than the full site.

kbradsha 5 pts

Well I was sold on the galaxy S 3 but now that it's only dual core, never mind.  The extra gig of ram is nice and all, but I'm not buying last years phone at this years prices for an extra gig of ram upgrade.  I'll wait for the international quad-core version.

TommyDaniel 15 pts

 kbradsha Yes, because the A15 based Dual is exactly the same as the A9 Dual /s

 kbradsha That makes absolutely no sense. If you look at benchmarks for the HTC One X, the dual vs quad core processor makes almost no difference - the dual core even wins in most single-threaded actions. In fact, if there's one thing to be learned from the One X, it's that RAM makes a huge difference - people are complaining about the inability to keep multiple apps in RAM, which leads to slower and less convenient multitasking. This is a result of poor minfree values and too little RAM.if tl;dr:More cores don't really matter. More RAM do really matter. 

kbradsha 5 pts

I'm sure you'll all be happy with your purchase.  I'm a software engineer.  I've been programming computers for a living for over 12 years now.  I don't need benchmarks or anyone else's technical explanation to make my decision.  If Samsung keeps cranking out new phones this quickly, we may not have to argue very long before a quad-core with 2 gigs of RAM makes an appearance.

nsutherl 5 pts

 kbradsha You seem to be qualified to answer this. I'm genuinely curious, not trying to be smartass: Do you forsee there being a noticeable difference in speed between the Quad Eynos the int'l version will have and, say, a 1.2 GHz dual core like in my GNex? I rarely see any noticeable lag when navigating through my phone (opening apps, scrolling meuns, etc...), and like you, I think that's the true test of a phone's performance, not benchmark tests. During what sort of processes will a quad core really shine?

kbradsha 5 pts

 My reading on the Android 4 is that there is 1 thread always dedicated to driving the GUI while other service threads are relegated to the second core.  This works great for benchmark applications and for standard user interfacing.  Any instance where you have multiple services polling the cpu will benefit from the extra cores.  A common scenario for me is listening to google music through my car stereo -> a2dp bluetooth while simultaneously using google maps GPS navigation.  This combination locks up most single core phones.  Dual core phones handle it better but I still hear occasional stutters in the audio stream.  It may seem counter-intuitive to most to prefer a quad core and less ram, but it really depends on the applications you are using and the resource requirements.  I expect that for most people the 2 gigs of ram would be of more benefit, but I do a lot of development and multi-tasking with my phone so I will always prefer more CPU.

deitiphobia 6 pts

 kbradsha This is a lot like complaining about the difference from 8 megapixel to 12 megapixel. Most people don't really give a dam. Is it fast? Is it amazing? Then who cares what is behind the tech. 

TommyDaniel 15 pts

June 20th is the date the tour comes to New York

Sparklingcyanide 6 pts

gee, I wonder which two USA carriers will be the ones launching on June 20th.... T-Mobile and Att of course!!  day one purchase on Magenta for me! - D   thank you Samsung for not mucking it up this time,,

DavidVaughan 10 pts

@Sparklngcyanide the only reason why tmobile will get the quad is because no LTE, so I mean its not like we get anything better over the other carriers.....the newer duals run pretty much on last with the first gen quads .....q3 is where it's at this year....g3x is the powerhouse I'm waiting for and if no luck then hopefully the gnex comes to magenta, or there is always the note which is shaping up to be more like the note 1.5.....we shall see

Haloruler64 84 pts

@DavidVaughan wrong! The T-Mo SII had a Snapdragon for a reason. The Exynos couldn't handle 42 mbit HSPA+, while handling AT&T's 21 fine. So the T-Mo version will need that Snappy S4