Editorial: The Nexus Name Has Died, Can Google Bring It Back?

On October 19th of last year, I posted my first news article on this very site. That news article was about Google’s announcement of the Galaxy Nexus, the newest superphone at the time. It also marked the launch of Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, which is still making its way to devices now. At the event, no US carriers were announced, but not too long after Verizon came out to state it would be carrying an LTE version of the handset. After a few delays, the Galaxy Nexus finally hit the US on Big Red.

Except there was one issue: Verizon’s Nexus wasn’t a Nexus.

Historically, Nexus devices have been phones featuring completely stock builds of Android, and no carrier branding anywhere on the device. Those two characteristics define what a Nexus is, and Verizon’s variant didn’t fit either of those. The device had two Verizon apps pre-loaded, effectively taking the stock out of the Android build. Throw in the branding on the back of the device, and you’ve got a device that’s no different from the latest DROID or EVO.

After speaking with Evan Selleck from PhoneDog, it became clear to me that Google has lost their control. If device manufacturers like Apple can get a handset on Verizon without any sort of extra software or carrier branding, why can’t Google? They even let Samsung step all over them, as the ‘Galaxy’ part of Galaxy Nexus has no reason being there. The Galaxy brand is Samsung’s, not Google’s. It should be kept out of a device name that is part of a different line of phones.

A Nexus device is supposed to receive updates before other Android handsets, but as Taylor Wimberly from Android and Me pointed out in an article earlier today, Verizon is holding the Nexus back from receiving some essential updates.

Google killed their own brand.

Now we’re hearing that Google has plans to launch up to five new Nexus devices, to be created by more than one manufacturer. Not only will Google be using the Nexus branding on the devices, but will supposedly be selling the devices themselves. That’s right, the plan is to cut out carriers, go the unlocked route, and take full control. Will that actually happen? This tech blogger isn’t getting his hopes up.

Google has destroyed what was once the most coveted brand of phones among hardcore Android users, and more devices won’t fix the problem. Google needs to go back to its roots, it needs to create a device with pure Android at heart, no branding other than its own. Is that too much to ask for?

Tags: , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
nathan118 15 pts

If Google killed the Nexus name...it was by bending the knee to Verizon. Selling the GSM Galaxy Nexus is a huge step to fix that mistake. So to say they've "killed" the name is an over-exaggeration to get page views.

 

And the last line...."Google needs to go back to its roots, it needs to create a device with pure Android at heart, no branding other than its own. Is that too much to ask for?"

 

DUH...that's what they did with the play store. Unless you're soooo bothered by the word Galaxy in the name, but if that's the case, you can't be helped.

GLinzan 5 pts

 nathan118 I happen to agree with you, even though, I'll admit to having a strong disliking to Google "bending the knee to Verizon." But I don't think they've corrected the issue by "Selling the GSM Galaxy Nexus" since, as is customary with almost all Samsung phones, they tend to strongly resemble Apple's iPhones, and any Android fan boy who loves the crudest form of Stock Android has some deep seated hatred for iPhones. Therefore, I'll have to agree with Joey on his statement: "Google needs to go back to its roots, it needs to create a device with pure Android at heart, no branding other than its own. Is that too much to ask for?"

 

--G. L.

nathan118 15 pts

 GLinzan Resemble the iPhone? Needs Pure Android? What are you talking about? The Galaxy Nexus is nothing like an iPhone, and it's running PURE android. How could they have made it any more pure? Pure android has never had anything to do with the hardware...it's about software.

 

Sorry, you're way off base.

GLinzan 5 pts

 nathan118 Oh, Nathan, you're right! Scratch what I wrote> I was thinking of something else. Good catch.

GLinzan 5 pts

We Stock Android Fan Boys are a dying breed. When the Nexus One first came out, it was graciously received for using the Stock Android operating system, free of the bloatware and personalization carriers put on newer phones today. The last phone I can remember with a decent Android operating system was the LG G2x running on Vanilla Android. What do you guys think?

Quasar_wpg 7 pts

Speak for yourself. I ordered the GSM Galaxy Nexus the first day Google started selling it in the Play Store, and I love it! It is a sweet upgrade from my Nexus One, and it IS running the newest version of ICS. I'm sure it will get Jellybean and likely the next version after that so it should get me by for a couple of years like my N1 did. It's true it would've been nice if Google had sold it unlocked from the beginning but lets face it, Verizon (and Sprint) is NOT an open network like those of AT&T and T-Mobile. If Google was going to get their Nexus brand on the nation's largest network, they were going to have to make some compromises because there are plenty of other high end Android devices for Verizon to choose from. That can't be said about the iPhone. There is only one place Verizon could get that. If Google is going to go totally unlocked for the future, that's great but you probably won't see another Nexus device on Verizon unless the customers demand it. That hurts Google too because they can't sell to nearly half the country. Hopefully they will continue to have a strong relationship with Sprint so they can sell the future Nexus devices through them as well.

JesseJameson 6 pts

Let's be quite honest with each other. Was Google doing well in Nexus Sales before the "Galaxy Nexus"? No. Did this help them? Yes. Verizon is screwing over this device, but that is one carrier. Yet it's still selling well in a lot of markets for them. Plus to add that they are expanding over numerous carriers has helped them. Yeah Google may of sold out, but why do you think that is? "Money" it talks. 

Get_at_Me 8 pts

 JesseJameson i cant disagree with you here...it still sucks though.  My thought process is If you're going to start playing favorites with carriers, don't even bother developing nexus devices anymore....Google made a decision awhile back to get into the hardware mix (N1)....Not to compete with carriers or manufacturers, but to show them what android was capable of on the hardware and software sides. They should stick to that philosophy and not get mixed up with carriers.

JesseJameson 6 pts

 Get_at_Me I always compare Google's situation to how Microsoft handles Windows. It's on tons of manufacturer's, and they all have their own apps on them. Yes the option to delete is there, which is something many wish Android had without rooting. Nexus needed some sort of lift, because Google wanted to make the brand name more mainstream.  

Get_at_Me 8 pts

@JesseJameson google should advertise the nexus phones then. They played into the system. Manufacturers and carriers have their own agenda which generally does mess well with a "nexus device". All the other carriers committed to the gs2 and the iphone 4s was just released. Tough spot for google but they shouldnt be in the ring looking for sales. The android eco system is crowded enough already with a new flagship being unveiled or released every month. If its not one manufacturer its another.....google should stick to evolving the os and stay out of the sales end of the business....

Most melodramatic article I have ever read. Lost quite a bit of respect for the site.

JesseJameson 6 pts

I think this article is drastic. Google is not an OEM and is not controlling the hardware part. The Nexus brand is still very big and in no way dying. My best opinion is they added Galaxy to the name for marketing reasons. To sell more, and bring in more then just hardcore Android users. I mean look at sales of the Galaxy line. It's glaringly obvious why Google did this.

Get_at_Me 8 pts

 JesseJameson But it wasn't necessary to get in bed with VZW.....There shouldn't have been an exclusive carrier for this phone.  I think a major issue for Google was the timing of the US Galaxy S2 launches and the GN unveiling.

JesseJameson 6 pts

 Get_at_Me Was the small window really that big of a deal? Agreed! A big issue was Samsung really didn't go all out for the CPU/GPU on the Gnex, because they didn't want the Nexus selling more then the flagship device for them. 

Joey Lehto 13 pts

 JesseJameson You completely missed the point of the article. I owned a GSM Galaxy Nexus, I loved that handset. There was nothing wrong with it. It was the fact that the Verizon version took everything that defined what a Nexus is away, that the brand means nothing anymore. 

 

JesseJameson 6 pts

 Joey Lehto I didn't miss anything. Just read the article as it states. In what way besides putting BA? You're saying that the Nexus brand is dead? How so? Please elaborate for me.

JesseJameson 6 pts

 Joey Lehto It's still pure Android experience. Which no other device offers. What other device out of the box has ICS stock?

Sparklingcyanide 6 pts

 Joey Lehto  JesseJameson Joey's absolutely right on this, Verizon did nothing but taint a perfectly beloved branding.  Good thing they still sold it as unlocked for GSM carriers.

JesseJameson 6 pts

Can't fully agree, because the device sells well. It's still a pure Android experience, to which nothing Verizon has "Does". Either way you look at it, the Nexus sells more today then it ever did. 

JesseJameson 6 pts

Let's also not forget that we are talking about "Verizon". The dictator carrier of them all. They only gave into Apple because they needed the iPhone so badly. They didn't need the Nexus. However Google wanted to launch on the largest carrier and test that water. 

Joey Lehto 13 pts

 JesseJameson If apps that aren't found in AOSP are pre-loaded onto a phone at launch and cannot be removed, that means it isn't stock anymore. Anyways, today marks 5 months from the release of the Nexus on Verizon, and they haven't updated it since day one. It doesn't matter if the device sells well, it still took what was the pure Nexus brand and changed that. The Galaxy Nexus on Verizon is not what I would consider a Nexus device. 

 

JesseJameson 6 pts

 Joey Lehto When we first received the Nexus is had 4.0.1, then received an incremental update supposedly OTA, and we were prompted to update upon pulling them out of the box. The version stayed 4.0.1, but the the build had changed along with the radio. Then I want to say about two months ago, we were again prompted coming out of the box to update to 4.0.2. To which they all had 4.0.1 at the time. So my question is..? Those aren't considered updates?

JesseJameson 6 pts

 Joey Lehto Just remember that Verizon is notorious for this, and it comes as zero surprise. At least in this case, I would only assume you have been around this business long enough to know that. 

Joey Lehto 13 pts

 JesseJameson The current Android version is 4.0.4. Not 4.0.2. Shouldn't a Nexus be as up-to-date as possible? 

nathan118 15 pts

 Joey Lehto Just because there is ONE bad nexus device, a mistake Google made, doesn't kill the entire brand. That's saying that the nexus one, nexus s, and unlocked GSM Galaxy Nexus mean absolutely nothing because of one phone. Good thing you're not a marketing major.

MargaritoPatino 6 pts

I have a Galaxy Nexus and I absolutely love it. The fact that it came pre-loaded with two Verizon apps and the word Verizon on the back has zero effect on me. 

JesseJameson 6 pts

 MargaritoPatino Main reason VZW made it clear that Backup Assistant needed to be on there, was because of how many people used the service. Verizon use to make this mandatory with every sale of a device, that BA be set up. This is why many Verizon locations and retailers do not have Cell Brite or other machines for contact transfer left. 

Get_at_Me 8 pts

I agree completely!!!!  I think Google went temporarily insane giving VZW US exclusivity on the GN.  What were they thinking?  That launching their flagship device on America's largest network would somehow catapult the Nexus name into mainstream???  Meanwhile, the IPhone 4S launched on 3 US carriers at the same time.  I really hoped they learned their lesson.

Tuliomesa82 23 pts

I think its harder for google to create their own phones since they are mostly a software engineer company and not a hardware sorts, maybe with their recent purchase of motorola they can do something with the nexus name and revive it, but remember its still just going to be a motorola google phone. Unless somehow google creates a branch where they create a unique and i mean unique looking phone, not the next iphone but the next google phone, that allows for innovation and technology and makes people want it and makes other companies follow their example, i highly doubt there will be anything truly nexus. 

 

In order for google to do anything they need to create their own google phone, and i mean google branding everywhere with reliable parts and reliable hardware and of course the software. But google makes more money selling in the other manufactures and of course are dominant of the smartphone industry. Why give that up to make their own phone? thats why they have other companies who are iwlling to use their software in their hardware.

 

Google needs to take a whole new prespective if it really wants a true google phone, and i mean create your own parts! but i dont see that happening an time soon since google is just a software company and not ahardware tech.And unless google can innovate the next new hot thing, i dont see a true google nexus  phone coming any time soon.

Tuliomesa82 23 pts

One thing i would like to add is the google glasses, now thats the direction they should head in but with phones

Get_at_Me 8 pts

 Tuliomesa82 I think Google could partner up with a company like ASUS on Nexus device

Sparklingcyanide 6 pts

I really hope this happens, No Carrier should have control over the Nexus phones.  Unlocked or don't even make them, look how horrible the Galaxy Nexus went over through carriers.

PTzero 6 pts

I have the i9250 Galaxy Nexus and it's as pure of a Google phone as it comes. You only have yourself to blame if you bought into the Verizon device.

Good read, points out how the Nexus line has changed since the Nexus One. As far as saying that the Nexus name has died, I think it's a bit extreme considering that the Galaxy Nexus still runs a totally stock version of Android, plus a few carrier-related apps. It is true that Google is losing control of the Nexus line, but it's still one of the hottest devices for development, whether it be the LTE or GSM version. I hope at least some of the rumors floating around are true, and that Google sells the Nexus devices unlocked, without any carrier interference. 

All in all, still a great read! :)