I Applaud Samsung for Taking Over Control of Their Galaxy SIII Release

The way a lot of high end Android phones being released has always been a head ache for most consumers. There’s so many factors that lead to the eventual release of Android handsets from the carrier and from even the manufacturer. Last years Galaxy SII launch I felt was the worst I’ve ever seen. The European SII came out during the Spring of 2011 and it didn’t see a US release till almost half a year later! And what made it even worse was that the T-Mobile, Sprint and AT&T versions all looked different and had different names. While all of these were SII’s, they had so much variation within each device whether it came down to screen size and even processors.

I’m ecstatic to see that Samsung realized what a huge flaw that really was and decided to change the way they released their flagship device this time around. The 5 month gap between the initial release of the international SII and US SII had to go, and I’m glad to see that Samsung has finally taken control of their phone and release them all in relatively the same time. While the international version has been out for a couple of weeks now, all 5 of US’s major cell phone carriers have already released their launch dates for their respective SIII’s and what’s even better is that they all look and are named the same! No more useless names like the Skyrocket or Epic 4G Touch. Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint, AT&T and US Cellular will all keep the Galaxy SIII name. I think this is great as it will cause much less confusion and differentiation between them for customers. And as for me, the best part about this will definitely be the accessories! I have a GSM Galaxy Nexus now and I love the fact that accessories such as cases are at an abundance since the whole world virtually has the same form factor Galaxy Nexus. And now we can all say the same for the Galaxy SIII. Docks, cases and other accessories should be universal now and relatively easier to find for the consumer.

While many of us have complained about the SIII and how Samsung chose the way they designed it, we definitely have to commend Samsung for taking this right direction in how a phone release should be handled. Now I really hope HTC will follow in these footsteps. HTC had a perfect opportunity to do the same with their One lineup and I felt like they really dropped the ball on this one. Only time shall tell if more companies will follow suit on this, but we can only hope that this will be a trend that will soon to be followed.

Tags: , , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
whipmanjak 12 pts

This is a great article! I agree with everything about Samsung in here and I also believe HTC messed up their One series. The One X is nice, but no removable battery or micro sd card slot? Thoseare two factors that I love on Android phones!

Mackster248 15 pts

 whipmanjak They really did! HTC had it perfectly in line for them to make their One lineup known. But nope... They didn't give one to TMO and Verizon and the Sprint one looks ugly paired with the Ugly Evo4G LTE name when it could have been cooler if they named it the Evo One. Oh well :P

TheDark_Knight 77 pts

While I like that Samsung has taken control of their flagship device, I hate that they jacked up the ICS experience. Now it's Google's turn to take control of their product and brand. At least HTC keep the button layout the same, while Samsung just kept the old Gingerbread layout. Well, I'm not sure what I'm going to do when I'm up for upgrade. I think I'm going to use it to make some cash off the iPhone 5. :-)

VKwstas 6 pts

Google went with virtual buttons, witch are super great(they change form, position, etc), but since Samsung used non-virtual buttons, I believe they did the right thing to keep the GB layout; look at the HTC One X's 3dot on screen button, it's atrocious and counter intuitive. Many users root the HOX just to change that multitasking button to a menu button, because sadly, the menu button still rules in android apps.Great article btw! It's what I was discussing in another tech site earlier today. Accessories quantity and availability should be great .

TheDark_Knight 77 pts

@VKwstas Unfortunately, you're sort of right about the three dot settings button. My wife doesn't really care since the screen is so big. Google needs to push for developers to get rid of the menu button or reroute it to the top like YouTube app and PLAY store. Well, I do like the design of the GSIII at least. I'll probably wait til the next GS.

MdXMaxX 21 pts

Samsung has outdone itself.  They've got this launch all synchronized, the device is top-notch (2100mAh battery and 720p display FTW), TouchWiz is looking leagues better than it has in past iterations, and they've already released the source code, meaning quick development and ROMs galore!

 

My next phone is definitely going to be from Samsung.  I don't give a damn that it's made out of plastic; that hardly matters when none of the other manufacturers can seem to get it together.

Mackster248 15 pts

 MdXMaxX You know what, I never understand why people complain about the plastic finish. One, it makes the phone sooo much lighter I love that! And two, I slap a case on it anyways so even if it were metal it wouldn't matter. I love what Samsung's doing. Only thing I don't like now is the theme of TW. While I love TW, I just don't like the theme much. But that doesn't really matter! Everything else is awesome! 

mbcls 18 pts

 Mackster248 i getting tired of keep hearing morons complain "samsung phones made with cheap plastic!".   it' a phone, who give a F!   does having better phone material makes you have a bigger penis? haha.  or the chicks like you more?  if you want to impress the chicks, get a expensive sport car!

Mackster248 15 pts

 mbcls Haha, preach on man. :) but I agree! 

Haloruler64 84 pts

 mbcls  Mackster248 Their phones are made of very high end plastic. Plastic, but durable stuff. Samsung devices last me forever, while my cousin had a lot of issues with a multitude of HTC devices in terms of build quality.