Editorial: OUYA Could Destroy Traditional Gaming, And That’s Not A Good Thing

It’s no secret that people like to get things free. Whether it be an app, a game, even a new car, when something is free, you just feel that much better about getting it. The era of apps we currently live in has a large portion of free offerings, up to the point where apps that once sold for a buck or two have been switched to the freemium model. Whether it be ads, or additional paid content, the app developers still make money off of their free apps. But, is it really worth it to download a free game, only to pay 5 dollars to get all of the power-ups available?

Some game developers in both the mobile and traditional world have found success in making their games either free-to-play, or using the freemium model. The freemium model is found more in mobile apps, in which a developer offers two versions of the app, one is free with limited content, the other at a price with more content. Free-to-play is offered mainly on PCs, giving players the game free, but usually offers them the option to pay for in-game items and power-ups.

For those who don’t know me, I’m a huge gamer. I own all the major game consoles (Xbox 360, PS3 and Wii), a powerful gaming PC, and even a PS Vita for on the go. I play mobile games quite often as well, but tend to play the more casual, addicting games, versus a more feature packed one like Dead Trigger. I’m more than familiar with both the freemium and free-to-play models, and let’s just say I’m not a fan of either.

A few weeks ago, a new game platform, OUYA, emerged on Kickstarter. It runs Android, and will offer a library of all free-to-play games. It achieved its Kickstarter goal in less than 24 hours, and is now sitting on over 5 times the funding originally requested. On paper, this sounds like a great idea, right? Not in my mind.

As we move into this era of free-to-play, it brings more watered-down content with it. The base games aren’t very feature rich, instead making users pay more just to get the best experience out of a game. This isn’t necessarily true for every free-to-play game, but can apply to the majority. I’d rather pay my $60 up front for a game like Skyrim, which offers everything  on the disc (or download), without the need to pay extra just to fully experience the full game (there’s DLC, but that’s a different story for a different website).

OUYA uses NVIDIA’s Tegra 3 ARM-based processor as its graphics driving force. When I hear the name NVIDIA, I typically think of their line of high-end gaming graphics cards. Don’t let the name NVIDIA fool you, as the Tegra 3 is nothing more than another smartphone processor, designed for Android phones and tablets. Sure, games like Dead Trigger and Shadowgun look great on the Galaxy S III, but that doesn’t mean it’s going to look great on my 55-inch Samsung plasma TV.

The reception OUYA has received so far has truly scared me, not just for the platform itself, but the concept in general. If OUYA takes off, who knows what else is to come. Maybe Nintendo decides they’ll do the same thing, and the next Super Mario game will be free-to-play. Perhaps Microsoft thinks that more people would play Halo 5 if it were free, and offers it for everyone to download on Xbox LIVE. Even the profit-hungry executives at Activision could decide that Call Of Duty: Modern Ops 16 would be better if they offered the game for free, including only a pistol, making you pay real cash for the weapons you want.

In reality, I have a strong feeling that OUYA won’t even hit the production stage. The creators are pegging it for a launch in March of next year, and unless they have some funding coming from elsewhere, $5.5 million isn’t going to get them very far. I know, you’re thinking that $5.5 million is a huge number, but remember that half the backers have literally purchased the consoles through their backing, plus the fees for production, marketing, support, packaging, licensing, and the list just goes on and on.

If OUYAs do in fact ship, that will be a very dark day for this blogger, but let me know what you think. Drop a comment below, for even tweet me @jlehto43 on Twitter!

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

i think that the OUYA is out there to help traditional gaming...i like it!

 

cloud7a 6 pts

Honestly it's not so bad. 1. It will allow a new generation of developers to make great games indie at a fraction of the cost that it takes for big companies to put something out. 2. It might make the big boys in the industry finally up their game and start putting out better quality product. And last but not least. 3. I have a few games in the works and I know how to program for android but what I want to make would work better on a console and not on a phone and this gives me the ability to get what I want out there instead of having to depend on my xbox(which I love and use all the time) or the ps3(which I really never use because I have a blu ray player now) to get a game that is not worth the 10-20 dollars when I would rather pay 6 for minecraft for my phone and just have fun.

Ill get OUYA to watch netflix or play some casual games while laying down on sofa. Free to play games will die because of hackers. Look at the amount of hacks on android! Everything will be cracked on OUYA within days. I don't think it's going to be an easy challenge for OUYA since they want to give root access to it by default as far as i know.  with root i can do whatever i want with anything i install on android...

JQuest81 88 pts

@YK I wouldn't mind having an OUYA if it could be hacked to use as an emulator... bad, I know... but I'm sure there's not one single person who doesn't do it already... :-)

astontopgears 19 pts

 JQuest81  YK I'm sure that will happen. It's going to be completely open and will be able to run most Android apps, so you could probably just sideload an emulator APK and you're good to go.

JQuest81 88 pts

 astontopgears Agreed. That's very true.

the OUYA is open to hacking, if you want to play games maybe you could hack too

JQuest81 88 pts

That'll never happen... The console gaming community already turns their nose up at DLC... for the simple fact is that most people will pay 60 bucks for a game, then they pay 5 bucks average for DLC... Then the company will turn around and sell the game with all the DLC down the road for 20-40 bucks cheaper... And let's not get on Capcom and their business model... The second a console franchise goes to a freemium model, that's the day that franchise dies. I think there's room for OUYA as it wouldn't be any different than me mirroring my tablet for a session of Dead Trigger and the like.

MysticLeviathan 7 pts

Nintendo is destroying traditional gaming more than OUYA EVER could.  If you want to get mad at someone for the demise of traditional gaming, get mad at Nintendo.

astontopgears 19 pts

 MysticLeviathan Yeah, I completely agree.

JQuest81 88 pts

 MysticLeviathan Nintendo is just making casual gaming more traditional... I don't think they are destroying it by any means, being they still pump out  AAA quality first party titles, that the hardcore and casual alike enjoys.... As gamers, we all know that Nintendo have and will march to the beat of it's own drum anyways...

MysticLeviathan 7 pts

 JQuest81 That's the problem, they AREN'T pumping out AAA quality titles the way they did with the Gamecube.  That's the problem.  Nintendo is prioritizing this "revolution" crap over quality games.  Nintendo would rather innovate than release quality titles which bothers me the most.  And Microsoft and Sony are following suit because it brings in cash, even though it ends up in terrible games being made.  How many great Kinect games have there been?  How many PS Move games have there been?  And I don't count great games that have added Move/Kinect support.  The fact is Nintendo has far fewer AAA quality titles than Microsoft and Nintendo, partially because the Wii's BS prevents those great crossplatform games from coming out on the Wii.  And if they do come out, it's heavily modified and almost always inferior to the 360/PS3 versions.  

 

Nintendo is trying to fix what ain't broke.  If this OUYA thing means i can play games with a regular, simple controller that I don't have to flail around like an idiot, I'm sold.  If Nintendo would quit trying to reinvent the wheel and just release traditional consoles to directly compete with the 360 and PS3, they'd be able to pump out some killer games while being able to support those great cross platform games like COD, Assassin's Creed, Battlefield, Mass Effect, etc.  The only reason I'd ever buy a Nintendo console is for the 1st party games like Mario, Zelda, and Donkey Kong.  But this motion controller gaming crap makes me want to stay the hell away.

JQuest81 88 pts

 MysticLeviathan Well I did say AAA quality first party titles... You know the Mario's and Zelda's and the like...  one could argue that one of the MAIN reasons to own Nintendo system is for the Mario/Zelda experience... because those generally going to be the best games across any console. I agree with you, third party support is less than stellar (except for a handful of games) on the Wii but that's not surprising considering that  is something they've struggled with since the Nintendo 64 days. With the release of the Wii U, they are at least attempting to rectify that.

 

It's not a matter of them trying to fix what ain't broke... They just do things their way and in their own time... When everyone else was moving on to disc based systems.. they went on and stuck with cartridge. When  they FINALLY decided to drop the cartridge and go disc based, it was some proprietary based disc and let's not forget how long it took for them to adopt an online model and they even do that differently from Sony/MS... Outside of this year where they took their first loss ever since they broke into the video game business about 30 years ago, I'd say whatever they are doing was (is) working...

 

I personally don't mind flailing around a controller like an idiot... it's a welcom diversion in my book. There could be some awesome cross platform games if Third parties were willing to work with Nintendo. All they have to do is make a control scheme for motion and one scheme for the regular controller attachment... (kind of like how those SAME third party developers incorporate Move/Kinect support) I'm sure that means extra development dollars, time, and them actually having to think a little more outside the box, but it's feasible to have the best of both worlds on a Nintendo system.

ClaytonDallas 5 pts

 JQuest81 "You know the Mario's and Zelda's and the like...  one could argue that one of the MAIN reasons to own Nintendo system is for the Mario/Zelda experience... because those generally going to be the best games across any console."*coughbullshitcough* Those games are nowhere near in the same league as even some of the worst titles on the other two consoles. They have virtually no story, absolutely no character depth, and nothing aside from mediocre gameplay. Nintendo fanboys aside, anyone with half a brain could see it. >:I I don't even consider the Wii as part of the current generation of consoles. 

JQuest81 88 pts

 ClaytonDallas I suppose everyone is entitled to an opinion, no matter how shallow and narrow minded said opinion is...

 

I'll give you the fact that Mario doesn't really have a story per se, but let's not pretend that Mario hasn't set the bar for platform games (2D and 3D) for the past 27 years. 

 

Let's not pretend that Zelda has not only set the bar but  revolutionized the Adventure RPG  for the past 25 years and though there are some successful games in this particular genre, they are almost ALWAYS compared to Zelda. Oh and let's not pretend that Ocarina wasn't hearled as one of the greatest video game stories of all time... and the other's after that wasn't too far off.

 

Also let's not pretend that Mario and Zelda aren't generally the highest rated and biggest selling games across the three platforms and that those games alone moves the sales of systems.

 

You live in a strange world, because the world that everyone else live in, Wii is very much apart of the current generation on systems, I have all three and honestly I do play my XBOX 360 more than the other two. So I can say that I'm clearly not a "half brain Nintendo fan boy" I'm a true gaming enthusiast  that's not blind to the facts and history of video games. But then again, everything I'm saying probably doesn't matter to someone as shallow as yourself who probably thinks that Call of Duty is Gaming's post-modern masterpiece. 

ClaytonDallas 5 pts

@JQuest81 @ClaytonDallas I would rather not mention Call of Duty as its a relatively watered down shooter. The storylines were ok, and provided a nice cinematic shooting experience, but that was about it. Still better than Mario though. It also has sold more. Its also set the standard for single player and multiplayer shooters since the original released on the PC as a WW2 game. What's your point? Id rather play a solid action RPG like The Witcher. Or a GOOD adventure RPG like Fable. Nintendo can't even bother to hire voice actors for their games, and you call them AAA? I've owned all three consoles since shortly after they released. I haven't touched my Wii since I bought it. The only person who has is my 10 year old nephew. Its not narrow mindedness that makes me hate it.. its the fact the games are literally mind numbingly boring.

JQuest81 88 pts

 ClaytonDallas  Can't really compare Mario with CoD, two totally different experiences... Though one could argue that GoldenEye set the bar for the single and multiplayer shooter and CoD ran with it... and of course CoD would sell more.. it's a multi-platform game. Combine XBox, PS3 and PC sales, there you have it.

 

My point is that whether you want to believe it or not, almost every platformer, every action/adventure RPG is measured by Zelda/Mario... Yes I think Mario and Zelda are AAA titles..  but so do the countless other reviewers and other gamers out there and there sale numbers don't lie.  Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to take away anything from The Witcher or Fable, as they are good games, but most every Zelda/Mario game becomes an instant classic... It goes more for the former than the latter. I'm sure tons of others (that aren't necessarily Nintendo fanboys and are grounded in reality) would echo my sentiment.

 

You miss the point of why Nintendo doesn't have voice actors for their games (particularly Zelda) It has a voice by not having one.. their main reason they don't hire voice actors is because they say everyone has an idea in their head of what the characters sound like, so they don't want to ruin that experience for people. I particularly don't mind it as much as some.... but if they got actors and it was done right, then I wouldn't be against it either.

 

As for this debate, we'll just have to agree to disagree... as taste is subjective anyways. Though I do find it quite hilarious that it seems like you've come across this article two weeks later see my comment and go out of your way to open a livefyre account just to bash me and my taste. I only assume that you just opened up one because the only two, three comments you have on your stats are the comments you made to me.. but hey, I could be wrong... SMH

ClaytonDallas 5 pts

@JQuest81 Yep. I think we'll just agree to disagree. But I didn't make a livefyre account. I just signed in with facebook. XD

astontopgears 19 pts

 JQuest81  MysticLeviathan Agreed. Nintendo is really changing the way we game, not so much the games themselves...

Joey Lehto 13 pts moderator

 MysticLeviathan Look at the Wii U. It is definitely aiming at both the hardcore and casual crowd. Regular Wii support, along with the power to run games like Mass Effect 3 and Assassin's Creed 3. 

 

 MysticLeviathan yup

LyricalSwaggbih 6 pts

I don't think it will destroy traditional gaming. People will still buy the Xbox and Playstation brands because it has AAA exclusives many know and love BUT one thing you got wrong is that everything will be free to play. What they mean by Everything is free on Ouya is that everything will have a free DEMO if it isn't a free game already. This gives many developers ways to draw in the gamers. Once you play a demo and you like it... you want the entire game and thats when prices come in. The fact that it is open source (Due to the fact that its running on Googles Android OS) just gives developers more options for the games and the fact that a Ex COD developer has already jumped on board shows that the console has more potential than anything. They have been working with Nvidia to make sure that this Tegra 3 core will deliver high end console performance. I just think everyone should stop bad mouthing what it could do to ruin gaming till it actually comes out and attempts to deliver. Truth of the matter is... NOBODY knows what it will do till it actually does it.

astontopgears 19 pts

I don't think it will "destroy" traditional gaming. Most hardcore gamers have more that one console and at $99 the Ouya can easily be added to someone's living room.

 

Games will be nowhere near as complex or put together as the Xbox 360 or PS3, but that's not what its supposed to be. Ouya will be a casual gaming console, since you dont have to spend a dime on a game after you have the device.

nathan118 15 pts

"Sure, games like Dead Trigger and Shadowgun look great on the Galaxy S III, but that doesn’t mean it’s going to look great on my 55-inch Samsung plasma TV."

 

Uh...you do realize that S3 has an HD screen...and you're holding it super close to your face. It might be "bigger" on your tv, but it's farther away. In fact, it will probably look the exact same. Hold your phone at a comfortable distance, and "compare" it to your tv from your couch. The phone and tv probably look similar in size (big tv far away, small phone close up).