Editorial: Apple’s Win Against Samsung Isn’t as Bad as it Sounds

Samsung lost to Apple. Yes, we all know by this point. Tech sites everywhere have blown up with the news. Samsung owes Apple $1.05 Billion for its infringements (which were ruled willful). And on every articles the comments are the same: “…this is the end for Samsung and Android,” “Guess that’s the end of unlocked bootloaders,” or my personal favorite “I’m gonna have to buy a new phone now…” I apologize for being blunt here, but these are almost completely untrue.

For starters, nobody, I repeat, nobody is going to come to your house in your sleep and beat you until you give up your precious Galaxy S II. Your phone is yours. Apple CANNOT come take your phone from you. It’s yours to keep. Heck, enjoy the fact that you now have a “rogue” phone, you rebel, you. Apple received it’s ruling in reference to many phones, but the worst that could happen is that the phones could not be sold in stores anymore. Remember the Galaxy Nexus injunction? If Samsung loses its appeal, it’ll be similar to then. No phones are taken from you. You just simply won’t be able to get one anymore.

Another big one: the Galaxy S III. This phone is not going anywhere. In fact, the S III wasn’t even in the running for any of these infringements. Samsung’s new best-selling baby is still in the clear. So relax. Samsung is still making money, even with this ruling. Samsung released a statement revealing it sold over 10 million S IIIs. This is a major profit for them. Although I don’t believe that Samsung should have lost, it could have been much worse for them. Remember, Apple asked for $2.5 billion. Suddenly, $1.05 doesn’t seem so bad. Also, Samsung is involved in much more than cell phones. They are involved in much more than just computers as well. Samsung has much more income coming from many more places. Don’t worry, they can handle it.

Moving forward, Samsung has already begun differentiating itself from Apple and the competition. The S III is nothing like the iPhone 4s. Most software patents have been avoided with updates and simple Android/Touchwiz improvements. The Galaxy Note has nothing that Apple can really sue over. These are Samsung’s best-selling devices. They have created a spot at the top for themselves. Losing this doesn’t mean they are going anywhere. Whatever Samsung releases next will (more than likely) shoot to the top as well.

This whole patent war is awful, I agree. But this is far from over. Samsung will appeal and who knows what will happen then. For now, it is what it is. But it’s not the end of the world or Samsung. It’s a strange ruling, sure. But it’s not an end-all. Android and Samsung will continue on as they have been, because Samsung has made more of a splash with it’s differentiated S III than anything else. So, going forward, things will hopefully improve. You never now, maybe Samsung will start adopting a more stock experience. Probably not, but a man can dream right?

Tags: , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
yamigenshuku 16 pts

Samsung cannot be stopped, with the GSIII topping charts world-wide, the new GTab, and the GNote-II they are still the one to beat this year, something that I'm sure Apple knows is pretty hard by now.  Sure, Apple has it's fans and decent marketing so they will make sales no doubt about it, but in terms of functionality and innovation it's all about Samsung's Galaxy series.I'm and ex-iPhone/Fail user and I'm all about Team Samsung FTW, as I currently own a GSII, you're not missing anything now that the GSIII is here and the GNote-II which I will be getting when it comes to the states.

PeterSawyer 5 pts

Wow Apple played hardball and beat the Japanese at one of there own games. Although I have Samsung products nice to know it only costs them money

kanoneyez 71 pts

 PeterSawyer Japanese? Where did they come into this? Samsung is a South Korean company. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung

blade19 5 pts

 PeterSawyer As being part asian... they all look a like to you huh??? Samsung is a korean based company...

arnobie 6 pts

Last night, Apple Win over Samsung is a clear image that any tech innovation should taken first within U.S.A. premise. Because, Someone can copy and patent the same to U.S.A., which other countries do not practice, if they do, not as much as the U.S.A. is doing.In this victory, I have my questions to myself.1. Where Samsung should innovate? 2. What is the effect of this decision over other countries' laws and innovations?3. Do we need to have an international accepted practice of patenting system? 

kanoneyez 71 pts

 arnobie I like the latter part of your post. A few days ago I actually wrote a blog about it. See what you think:

http://bartreflect.blogspot.com/2012/08/bar-fight.html

arnobie 6 pts

 kanoneyez  arnobie I've read about your article, and I think it's time for International Community to hold a convention that will create a conclusion for this issue.

Don't mess with america, if you are against apple then you against america. You can't steal from apple but apple can stel. Apple is most dangerous technololgical disaster ever been. I hope he will be gone forever soon as possible.

mbcls 18 pts

Samsung could use this lawsuit to their average! If i'm the ceo of samsung, i put this on tv and newspapers ads "GET YOUR GALAXY SIII NOW BEFORE THE OTHER GUY BANS IT!". i bet siii will soldout everywhere!

kanoneyez 71 pts

 mbcls Interesting idea. (btw, I think you intended to write "... to their advantage" (yes?).

 

I don't think Samsung would do that though. Apple would latch onto that as an admission of guilt and persecute Samsung even more. I really wish the carriers would rally together and refuse to sell Apple products because Apple is also hurting their bottom line if Samsung is barred from doing business in the USA. That would send Apple a clear message that their tactics are unwelcome in the business market.

ClarkKent113 12 pts

I hope you're right about the S3. Samsung did back a whole lot of original features into it that are useful, like....

 

--Tap-to-top

--Swipe-to-screenshot

--Smart stay

--Lock screen ticker

-etc...

 

 

Also, shouldn't Google be suing Apple for stealing the Notification bar/system? I bet if Google and the manufacturers really thought about it and wanted to get ugly (just like Apple) they could find numerous things Apple had "copied" from them.

chasev13 6 pts

 ClarkKent113 they did copy, but I don't think Google had a patent so they probably can't really do anything about that.

JBLmobileG1 24 pts

@chasev13 @ClarkKent113 Actually a few days back Google filed with the court about multiple patents that Apple is violating because they didn't want to make a deal. Like I also say... Karma is a B**** Apple will get what they deserve soon enough.

bydavidrosen 8 pts

Nothing like? Siri... S voice... Nothing at all? Just saying... They could have at least called it like Galaxy Voice or G Voice or something...

kanoneyez 71 pts

 bydavidrosen Well, lets see here, "S" for Samsung. Makes sense to me. Oh, you thought "S" was for Siri? "S" is for a lot of words. I don't think Apple has yet gotten a patent on the letter "S."

bydavidrosen 8 pts

@kanoneyez of course its for samsung but its all a matter of making stupid decisions that got them to this point. All these little things that are clearly iOS like. Most people probably see S Voice and think "Oh they have a Siri too" ... If they had named it differently though it would stand more on its own as a completely original thing. Hey I love android, that's why I read the site, but Samsung is messing up.

 bydavidrosen  kanoneyez 

You idiot Siri was not found by apple, it has been occupied thus nothing to do with apple.

You apple fool...

 bydavidrosen  kanoneyez Apple didn't invent siri but I believe they have the patent for it...

kanoneyez 71 pts

Yeah, and I was just reading elsewhere that NASA is using the Android platform to control small satellites, specifically--the brains are Nexus phones. I wonder if Apple will sue NASA now?

JQuest81 88 pts

 kanoneyez You didn't hear patent 2,305,168 covers all shapes resembling satellites? (Okay, I know, bad joke)

TheOneandOnlyAnonymouse 36 pts

 JQuest81  kanoneyez oh and you forgot patent 2,305,168 that covers electricity. 

kanoneyez 71 pts

 TheOneandOnlyAnonymouse  JQuest81 And along with Al Gore, didn't Apple invent the internet too? ;-)