Editorial: Samsung Recently Released Ice Cream Sandwich On The Tab 10.1, That’s Absolutely Unacceptable

Here at DroidDog, all of our writers are usually in constant contact, using a group chat client to organize and converse among ourselves. More than a few times we have disagreed with matters, and last Friday was no exception. Dima Aryeh, one of our writers and a longtime friend of mine, felt that it was a good thing that Samsung is releasing a ‘stable’ update for his Tab 10.1. He has taken to the site to write his opinion on it, and the following paragraphs will express mine.

Back in early June of 2011 (seems a lot longer than a little over a year ago, I know), Samsung released the Tab 10.1. It was considered the luxury tablet of new Honeycomb tablets, with a slim design and powerful internals. A few months later, Google released the full Ice Cream Sandwich code to the world. That was in November of 2011, and now, 8 months later, and the Tab 10.1 is finally getting its official taste of Android 4.0. You read that right, not 4.1 Jelly Bean, but 4.0, Ice Cream Sandwich.

It took Samsung 8 months to update the Tab 10.1, and while the update is supposedly “stable” (something manufacturers can’t always say), 8 months is a very long time in this industry. Jelly Bean, the successor to Ice Cream Sandwich, was officially released to the world before the Tab got the update it had been long needing, and this not only speaks of the lack of care by Samsung, but every Android tablet OEM out there.

ASUS did a great job with updating one of their tablets, the Transformer Prime. The update was released earlier than expected, in fact, at a CES keynote on January 6th. That’s less than two months after Ice Cream Sandwich source dropped. Granted, it wasn’t fully functional from day one, but within a week ASUS sent out another update to make thing nice and stable. With that update, ASUS proved something: a stable Ice Cream Sandwich could be done in two months or less.

Did any other manufacturer even get close to what ASUS did? Not a chance.

And beyond that update from the Transformer Prime, ASUS got flaky. The original Transformer’s ICS update damn-near destroyed the device, and it took months before things could be deemed stable. At that point, my hope was lost in terms of Android updates for tablets. They took less priority than a phone would, and with good reason. Honeycomb tablet sales weren’t too great for the most part, so manufacturers decided to update their phones first. That doesn’t mean something like the Tab 10.1 can be forgotten, though. 8 months is far, far too long.

In that 8 month span many things happen. There was a new iPad, the release of a Nexus tablet, and the announcement of Microsoft’s own foray to the tablet world. Those 8 months treated owners of the Tab 10.1 poorly, and at least one commenter on our site has stated he sold his Tab for the lack of updates.

So, now it’s time to wonder when the current generation of tablets will receive their updates. Will it take another 8 months for Samsung to update the Galaxy Tab 2? What about ASUS and the Transformer Pad Infinity? The coming months will be hectic for the tablet market. With rumors of an iPad mini, the upcoming Microsoft Surface, and the next Kindle Fire, it’ll be tough for a stock Android tablet to fit in. If Samsung could prove to consumers that they’re actually capable of keeping their products up to date, there’s a chance they could move some tablets.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Spoken Word 32 pts

I guarantee that the update for the GTab 10.1 will still be buggy as hell! Samsung has introduced numerous new tablets with ICS this year. There is no excuse for the majority of GTab owners, particularly Wi-Fi owners, to still be waiting. Luckily I won my GTab 10.1 so it doesn't sting as much. But seeing it sitting there in the corner, barely usable after the Touch Wiz update, sure is annoying.

YumiFaeldo 5 pts

Just stop looking at Android updates with iOS updates in mind and you'll simply stop feeling about it. It just doesn't work that way in the Android world. Google releases a version of Android, public is aware. OEMs get the code, modify it to make it work for their devices, test it, fix it, test it again, then maybe finally release it. Apple develops a new version of iOS. No one knows about it. They port it to all their devices. Test it. Fix it. Public is still unaware at this point. Continue testing and fixing. Release Beta to devs....release it. Now public is aware and it's available for release.

wscaddie56 5 pts

answering all those that mock the choice of the sony tablet S, I received my ICS update months ago.  i also can get 6 hours of screen time off one charge, the battery life is sick!

 

we'll see how they handle JB with a new tablet coming out, but cheers to sony.

 

nothing new from sammy, if you want the latest and greatest on their hardware you need to root.

ClarkKent113 12 pts

Sweet, I got referenced in the article! 

 

To add to the fact that I sold my Galaxy Tab 10.1 because of a lack of updates (or seemingly any interest by Samsung to support the device), that bad experience has really tarnished my opinion of Samsung. I've been wanting a Galaxy S3 for months but now with the rumors of an HTC One X+ coming to T-Mobile in September, and the rumored HTC 5" superphone I may hold off buying another Samsung device because I'm not sure if they will roll out updates in a timely fashion.

 

YumiFaeldo 5 pts

@ClarkKent113 because HTC is better in updating their devices?

JQuest81 87 pts

 While I enjoy the fact that ASUS made rather timely updates to their Prime, It was super buggy.. even as stable as it is now, it still has it's occasional hiccups... I'd rather wait a little longer to have a more stable release than a something that's rushed out and it glitches out at the mere touch (exaggeration, I know). I think Samsung is doing leaps and bounds better at updating their software than where they were at a few years ago.

 

Let's also not forget that Samsung has it's "Touchwiz" UX, so any updates that come are going to be longer than say, something that is almost a Pure Android device, like what we have in the Prime..Like  MtDewFella said, I'm grateful to get any updates at all from Android OEMs, being they aren't exactly entitled to give me squat (except for updates that fixes known or reported bugs). As long as it works and works well, I'm good. If I want the latest and greatest, I'll just shut up and get a Nexus device or wait for the developers community to pull through. 

 

I may be off base or not giving the general consumer any credit, but I don't think they know or even really care about updates. It's just us bloggers, tecnophiles and developers. The small lot of us just happen to have the loudest voice.

Haloruler64 82 pts

 JQuest81  MtDewFella See, I agree with you. The article Joey linked to was mine, where I state I prefer a long process with a great outcome :)

JQuest81 87 pts

 Haloruler64   I just read your article. It's a good read. I agree with you 100% you hit the nail on the head... I'm on here every day, How in the world did I miss it? :-)

 

On a side note, I enjoyed this article as well... I love the whole point/counter-point aspect of this issue... if possible, you guys should do more editorials in this format in the future!! Of all the tech blogs I read or have read, I've yet to see one quite like this. Keep up the good work guys!!

Haloruler64 82 pts

@JQuest81 @Haloruler64 thanks for the compliments! We'll definitely do more of this, it was quite fun!

MtDewFella 10 pts

Also while asus did update their tablets in a few months, I seem to remember they were also buggy because they didn't spend enough time testing the builds, Also if they are so swift, where's Jelly Bean for the OG Transformer.

"Us writers..."? I really hope that's some sort of joke.

MtDewFella 10 pts

You idiot, Jelly bean sources just released a few weeks ago, before then Samsung spent months getting ics ready for the tab, they're not going to throw away months of work just because Google released a new version (given how often Google releases android versions Samsung would never get any updates to the tablet if they started over every time a new version came out). That said they haven't had time to build the jelly bean rom for it, contrary to popular belief it takes more than sudo make ./config to compile a build of android for a particular device, just ask the xda developers, they have to port their "customizations" (it's gonna happen, deal with it freedom haters) write new drivers (driver's from previous build may not necessarily work) not to mention proper testing to make sure there's no bugs. (Developing an os for arm is harder than x86 as arm isn't standardized). Also on top of all that, they aren't even obligated to give you updates at all (like PC oem's don't just hand you a new version of Windows for free) so how about a little gratitude that they're updating the thing at all.

irie4ipier 6 pts

 MtDewFella

 I 100% agree with you and completely disagree with this guy. He brings up Asus, their ICS builds were complete crap up until about 2 months ago. Samsung releases ICS for this tablet with ZERO bugs, which is the way it should be. This guy is a known Samsung hater, I think he uses an iPhone as a daily driver as well, I applaud Samsung on their ICS build, it is awesome and buttery smooth. Screw this guy people, don't pay attention to him.

Haloruler64 82 pts

 irie4ipier I'm glad people agree with me! That's exactly what I was saying!However, you're being a little harsh on the guy. He is not a Samsung hater, and his daily driver has been a Galaxy S III for a while. He's just sick of the Android update situation.

MtDewFella 10 pts

 Haloruler64  irie4ipier Every system has it's pros and cons, one of the cons of the distributed system (one os across multiple OEMs like windows on PCs or Android on ARM devices) is slower updates as opposed to a vertically integrated system like macs or ios devices. one of the pros however is increased competition as a consumer can switch manufactures without having to re buy/download apps/content. This increased competition drives down pricing which is why we now have decent (not top of the line but decent) smartphone for less and 100 dollars with no subsidy or contract.